JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 18, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Cesar Augusto Rivera Muñoz

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia. Juzgado Penal Municipal De Ibague Vs. Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo Del Tolima
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó al Juzgado Octavo Penal Municipal de Ibagué asumir el conocimiento de la tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Caja de Compensación Familiar de Tolima -COMFENALCO-.

En este caso se dio aplicación al principio de la perpetuatio jurisdictionis, de donde se deriva la regla, conforme a la cual, una vez radicado el conocimiento de un proceso de tutela en determinado despacho judicial, si el juez considera necesario vincular a otros sujetos para la debida protección de los derechos fundamentales, resulta inadmisible trasladarlo a otro en razón del cambio de naturaleza de las entidades demandadas.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Ordenar al Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Penal Municipal de Ibague, asumir en forma inmediata el conocimiento de la accion de tutela promovida por Cesar Augusto Rivera Munoz, contra la Caja de Compensacion Familiar de FENALCO de -COMFENALCO-.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.